English.taand.com
afghan news   
Home FAQ RSS Links Site Map Contact
 
..:: Hot News:    
All News
News
Articles
Press
culture
English Pashto
Afghanistan

Newsletter
Your Name:
Your Email:
Submit

 
Press 
Karzai demands transfer of U.S. military prison near Bagram to Afghan control
Thursday, 01.05.2012, 04:27pm (GMT)

By Kevin Sieff/ Washington post

KABUL — President Hamid Karzai on Thursday called for the United States to hand over its biggest military prison in Afghanistan within one month, despite repeated warnings that Afghan institutions are woefully unprepared to detain or try suspected terrorists.

Karzai claimed that Afghan government investigators found violations of the Afghan constitution and international human rights conventions at the prison, which houses about 2,600 inmates near Bagram Airfield. He did not provide details about the alleged violations, but said in a statement that they constituted a “breach of Afghan sovereignty.”

The transfer of the prison, called the Parwan detention center, and its burgeoning population of detainees is regarded by both Afghans and Americans as a critical marker of the war’s endgame — a sign that Afghan officials are ready to inherit institutions essential to the nation’s future. U.S. officials said in a public memorandum two years ago that they expected the prison to be transferred in early 2012. Karzai interpreted that timeline as being firm, but U.S. officials point to a caveat in the document: that it was subject to “demonstrated capacity.”

The country’s judicial system has remained weak, U.S. officials said, raising concerns that Afghans would be unable to prosecute or detain the large number of insurgents captured by NATO forces and allowing dangerous Taliban fighters to slip through the cracks. In July 2011, officials told The Washington Post that the United States would be unable to relinquish authority at the prison until at least 2014, just as the last foreign troops are scheduled to leave Afghanistan.

“At this point, the Afghans don’t have the legal framework or the capacity to deal with violence being inflicted on the country by the insurgency,” one U.S. official said then. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter.

On Thursday, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said in response to Karzai’s comments: “We’re going to continue to work with the Afghan government to implement the transition that we have both agreed needs to happen of detention operations in Afghanistan. We need to do this in a manner that is maximally responsible.” She said she could not comment further on the timeline for the transfer.

The existence of the U.S. military prison about 30 miles north of Kabul has long been seen by Afghans as a sign of imperial overreach, and it has been singled out for criticism by Karzai for many years. The U.S. military has detained suspected insurgents at facilities in the area for about a decade. Most have been kept without trial, with less than a third of the prison’s detainees having been handed over for prosecution to an Afghan-run court.

Still, the number of Afghan judges and guards has risen steadily. As of July, the Afghan-run court at the prison was hearing about 50 cases a month.

Karzai has made bold claims in the name of Afghan sovereignty, and his insistence on the rapid prison transfer ranks among the boldest. But while he craves a more active role for Afghan institutions, he has also made repeated appeals for continued international support for the country beyond 2014.

A transition at the Bagram prison was expected to hold special symbolic value: Afghan defense officials argue that the Taliban has successfully used the prison as propaganda to galvanize insurgents, drawing on reports of harsh interrogation methods. An Army investigation into the deaths of two detainees in 2002 uncovered evidence of prisoners being chained to the ceiling by their wrists, and being severely beaten by guards.

The Pentagon facility was rebuilt in 2009 and the inmate review process was overhauled to increase transparency, officials said.

Staff writer Jason Ukman and researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.


Comments (0)        Print        Tell friend        Top


Other Articles:
. What does Pakistan want in Afghanistan? (01.01.2012)
. Did the USSR win the war in Afghanistan? (12.28.2011)
. Zardari in Dubai and rumours of coup in Pakistan (12.08.2011)
. The Creation of Pakistan was a Great Mistake of the 20th Century (11.21.2011)
. Afghanistan, Pakistan and Kashmir: A grand bargain? (10.21.2011)
. Commander Abdul Haq was a real Hero of Afghanistan (10.20.2011)
. Afghanistan envoy highlights errors of British strategy (10.12.2011)
. “We’ll Fight Against America For A Thousand Years If We Have To”: The Folly Of Afghanistan (09.18.2011)
. Afghan Army Attracts Few Where Fear Reigns (09.07.2011)
. Tolling of the bells in Kabul (08.14.2011)



 
Events
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
May 2013

Advertisement

Hot News
Why insider attacks are down in Afghanistan
Afghan, Pakistani forces again clash on disputed border; NATO troops broker truce
Afghanistan goes backwards while Taliban chiefs live it up in Qatar
The Afghan impasse/ By Maleeha Lodhi

Search